430. Flatten a Multilevel Doubly Linked List
Problem
You are given a doubly linked list which in addition to the next and previous pointers, it could have a child pointer, which may or may not point to a separate doubly linked list. These child lists may have one or more children of their own, and so on, to produce a multilevel data structure, as shown in the example below.
Flatten the list so that all the nodes appear in a single-level, doubly linked list. You are given the head of the first level of the list.
Example 1:
Input: head = [1,2,3,4,5,6,null,null,null,7,8,9,10,null,null,11,12] Output: [1,2,3,7,8,11,12,9,10,4,5,6] Explanation: The multilevel linked list in the input is as follows: After flattening the multilevel linked list it becomes:
Example 2:
Input: head = [1,2,null,3] Output: [1,3,2] Explanation: The input multilevel linked list is as follows: 1---2---NULL | 3---NULL
Example 3:
Input: head = [] Output: []
How multilevel linked list is represented in test case:
We use the multilevel linked list from Example 1 above:
1---2---3---4---5---6--NULL | 7---8---9---10--NULL | 11--12--NULL
The serialization of each level is as follows:
[1,2,3,4,5,6,null] [7,8,9,10,null] [11,12,null]
To serialize all levels together we will add nulls in each level to signify no node connects to the upper node of the previous level. The serialization becomes:
[1,2,3,4,5,6,null] [null,null,7,8,9,10,null] [null,11,12,null]
Merging the serialization of each level and removing trailing nulls we obtain:
[1,2,3,4,5,6,null,null,null,7,8,9,10,null,null,11,12]
Constraints:
- Number of Nodes will not exceed 1000.
1 <= Node.val <= 10^5
Discussion
The problem looks to be complicated, but rather straight forward once we visualize the flow.
Consider the default testcase of this question:
Handling the case with child nodes' presence, we have to perform action
among nodes: 3
, 4
, 7
and 10
, as in the below diagram. Wheres
red dotted arrow
indicates pointer to be removed, while the blue arrows
are
pointers to be added.
After one step of flattening the child node's list is merged, and we can see any nested child nodes will be scanned and merged with the same operation, as we scanning down along the master list.
We can see that keep doing the same operation, the existing list structure will not be destroyed and we can scan down the list. Hence we basically construct the operation required and it's done.
Solution
We use ptr
to handle the current scanning node, and so any operation
won't change the existing scanning node's structure. After we come up with
the operations with ptr
, we just keep doing it along the iteration down
the linked list.
# Definition for a Node.
class Node:
def __init__(self, val, prev, next, child):
self.val = val
self.prev = prev
self.next = next
self.child = child
class Solution:
def flatten(self, head: 'Node') -> 'Node':
ptr = head
while ptr:
if ptr.child:
next = ptr.next
ptr.next = ptr.child
ptr.child.prev = ptr
while ptr.child.next:
ptr.child = ptr.child.next
if next:
next.prev = ptr.child
ptr.child.next = next
ptr.child = None
ptr = ptr.next
return head
Complexity Analysis
- Time Complexity:
O(n)
, as we iterate along the linked-list, and nodes in child-linked-list are iterated twice. - Space Complexity:
O(1)
, as only temporary variables are saved during the operation.